Peer Review Process

This is informed to all authors and readers that the “International Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Communication” is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal committed to maintaining high academic standards, research integrity and originality. The journal follows a rigorous double-blind peer review system, in which the identities of both authors and reviewers remain confidential throughout the review process. A dedicated Peer Review Committee consisting of experienced academicians, researchers and subject experts has been constituted to ensure the quality, relevance and ethical compliance of published research.

Peer review is a critical quality control mechanism for any academic journal. Through this process, submitted manuscripts are evaluated from multiple perspectives including originality, clarity of writing, methodological rigor, technical accuracy, ethical considerations and relevance to the discipline. The review is conducted by subject experts in the fields of education, technology and social sciences to ensure scholarly contribution and practical significance.

Initially, each manuscript submitted to IJhssc is examined by the Editorial Board to assess scope alignment, formatting compliance and ethical standards. The editor’s office performs plagiarism screening using standard plagiarism detection tools. Manuscripts found suitable are then forwarded to two independent subject experts for double-blind peer review. If revisions or improvements are suggested, the manuscript is returned to the author for necessary corrections. Acceptance or rejection decisions are communicated to authors via email within 7–15 days of submission. Accepted papers are published within 7–15 days after receipt of all required documents.

Guidelines for Peer Review Process

International Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Communication is a reputed, peer-reviewed, refereed and multidisciplinary research journal dedicated to promoting high-quality scholarly research and maintaining academic integrity. The journal follows a structured, transparent and ethical peer review process in accordance with established publication standards to ensure the credibility, reliability and discoverability of published work.

This transparent peer review policy provides clear guidelines for authors, reviewers and editors, ensuring fairness, objectivity and consistency in the evaluation of all submitted manuscripts. The process supports high research visibility, effective indexing and long-term academic impact by publishing methodologically sound, original and ethically compliant research.

Purpose of the Review Process

Stages of the Peer Review Process

1. Initial Editorial Screening

Upon submission, each manuscript undergoes a preliminary editorial assessment to ensure compliance with the journal’s scope and quality standards. This stage includes:

■ Relevance Check – Whether the manuscript aligns with the scope of the journal.
■ Plagiarism Screening – Each submission is checked using advanced plagiarism detection software.
■ Quality of Research – Evaluation of research originality, novelty, and academic significance.
■ Language and Formatting – Ensuring clarity, coherence, and adherence to the journal’s formatting guidelines.

Manuscripts failing to meet these basic criteria may be returned for revision or rejected outright before being sent for peer review.

2. Double-Blind Peer Review Process

International Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Communication follows a Double-Blind Peer Review system, which ensures that:

■ Reviewers do not know the identity of the author(s).
■ Authors do not know the identity of the reviewers

Each manuscript is assigned to at least two independent subject experts based on their area of specialization. Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on:

1. Originality and Novelty – Whether the manuscript aligns with the scope of the journal.
2. Methodological Rigor – Each submission is checked using advanced plagiarism detection software.
3. Accuracy of Results – Evaluation of research originality, novelty, and academic significance.
4. Relevance of References – Ensuring clarity, coherence, and adherence to the journal’s formatting guidelines.
5. Language and Presentation – Ensuring clarity, coherence, and adherence to the journal’s formatting guidelines.

Reviewers provide detailed comments and recommendations, ensuring a high level of academic scrutiny and integrity.

3. Reviewer Comments and Revision Process

Upon submission, each manuscript undergoes a preliminary editorial assessment to ensure compliance with the journal’s scope and quality standards. This stage includes:

■ After the peer review process, the authors receive detailed feedback with suggested revisions.
■ Authors are expected to incorporate these revisions and submit the revised manuscript within the specified timeline.
■ If necessary, the revised manuscript may be sent back to the reviewers for a second round of evaluation.

The revision process ensures that all research papers published in the journal maintain the highest academic and ethical standards.

4. Final Decision by Editorial Board

The Editorial Board makes the final decision on manuscript acceptance based on:

1. Reviewers’ Recommendations – Final judgment from expert reviewers.
2. Editorial Assessment – Further scrutiny of language, coherence, and research contribution.
3. Compliance with Journal Guidelines – Ensuring adherence to journal policies.

The manuscript may be:

■ Accepted – If it meets all quality and ethical standards.
■ Accepted with Minor/Major Revisions – If improvements are required.
■ Rejected – If it fails to meet the required criteria.

Transparency and Ethical Standards

International Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Communication adheres to the ethical guidelines set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and the guidlines to ensure fairness, transparency, and accountability in research publication.

1. Plagiarism and Originality Check

⇒ Every manuscript undergoes plagiarism screening using advanced detection tools
⇒ Manuscripts with more than 10% similarity are automatically rejected or returned for revision.

2. Conflict of Interest Policy

⇒ Reviewers and editors must disclose any potential conflict of interest before accepting a manuscript for review.
⇒ Any bias or undue influence in the review process is strictly prohibited.

3. Reviewers and Editorial Board Accountability

⇒ Reviewers and Editorial Board Accountability
⇒ The editorial board ensures that decisions are made solely on the merit and quality of the research.
⇒ Reviewers are expected to provide constructive feedback and maintain confidentiality.